View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 24th June 2010, 05:21 AM
Avtal Avtal is online now
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The Golden West
Posts: 847
iTrader: (0)
Rep Power: 2437
Avtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura aboutAvtal has a spectacular aura about
Re: IDN gTLD discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 555 View Post
A couple additional examples:
I believe this is the 1st time specific relevant examples were used:
http://www.idnforums.com/forums/2422...gnso-idng.html Which led to that interview Aaron did with Chuck Gomes: http://idnblog.com/2009/12/03/exclus...omes-verisign/
I may be getting confused. I understand that "variants" means, for example, simplified versus traditional Chinese. These variants will be specified in a "variants table".

But Chuck Gomes (in the postings you cited) is talking about IDN versions of .com. If I'm not mistaken, [.com in IDN] is not a variant of .com, it is a translation.

Though variants and translations may be handled by similar mechanisms (DNAMES, BNAMES), I believe they are not the same thing, from ICANN's point of view. So some of the ICANN discussions may apply to one but not the other.

Like everyone else who has been paying attention, I believe that [.com in IDN] is coming. But I'm trying to get better at reading the tea leaves, so that I can understand the timing more clearly.

Thanks for all the informative posts!

Avtal
Reply With Quote