 |
 |
| idnforums | idntools |
|
|||||||
| IDN Rating System IDN Rating System. Use this as a measure of reference in the quality of an IDN domain. Members can add only one domain in each thread, & can start a new thread once per pay. IDNers must also place a poll in the thread from 1 to 10 (10 Being the highest quality) |
| View Poll Results: POS Domain or not | |||
| POS |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| circle the drain |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| one step above a toilet |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| two steps above a toilet |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| uh |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| pretty good |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| good |
|
0 | 0% |
| ok really |
|
0 | 0% |
| really ok |
|
0 | 0% |
| Great and wonderful domain |
|
1 | 100.00% |
| Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
02-11-2008, 12:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 梵帝冈.com (Vatican) Chinease
I'm not going to vote, because your choices are so negative, I think you know the outcome already.
梵蒂岡 (tr) 230k G results 梵蒂冈 (simp) 1.43m G results, 900 daily Baidu searches. Middle character, 帝, is wrong or unpopular. 
|
|
#3
02-11-2008, 02:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: 梵帝冈.com (Vatican) Chinease
Yes, 梵蒂冈 is better but looks like yours is still used. Baidu index averages low 200 searches a day for the correct one. The one you hold would only be worth anything if developed i think.
|
|
#4
02-11-2008, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 梵帝冈.com (Vatican) Chinease
Thank you very much for your advise
梵 帝 冈 xn--y6qp02apii.com Sorry just posting this for ease of comparison Last edited by lipps; 02-12-2008 at 01:08 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:26 PM.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103