IDN Forums - Internationalized Domain Names  
Home | Advertise on idnforums | Premium Membership

Go Back   IDN Forums - Internationalized Domain Names > IDN Discussions > General Discussion

General Discussion Feel free to talk about anything and everything in this board.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 9th August 2009, 01:50 AM
Wot's Avatar
Wot Wot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,605
iTrader: (30)
Rep Power: 1789
Wot will become famous soon enoughWot will become famous soon enoughWot will become famous soon enoughWot will become famous soon enoughWot will become famous soon enoughWot will become famous soon enoughWot will become famous soon enough
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asiaplay View Post
Great News - Congrats Gaint...

I am very happy to see this decision and that the final decision on these things can be made outside of just Hong Kong (there is some justice in the world ).

I also agree this is a very good test case and the result was very important - and case handled very well (well done!).

Cheers - Asiaplay

Has this made the HK newspapers yet?
__________________
红旗.com
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 9th August 2009, 02:50 AM
mulligan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,261
iTrader: (78)
Rep Power: 2148
mulligan will become famous soon enoughmulligan will become famous soon enoughmulligan will become famous soon enoughmulligan will become famous soon enoughmulligan will become famous soon enoughmulligan will become famous soon enoughmulligan will become famous soon enoughmulligan will become famous soon enough
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wot View Post
Has this made the HK newspapers yet?
If they don't already 'own' the publisher then a small payoff will suffice .. No?
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2009, 06:09 PM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Latest update from informers regarding adndrc hk :

a. Some INTERESTING statistics:

As at August 13 2009,

* There are some 200 domain names decision published by adndrc hk.

* There are cased spotted to be decided but not yet published by adndrc hk for over 1 year without giving reasons.

* There are 70 panelists on adndrc hk list.

* At least 3 panelists (3 / 70) are spotted for suspected irregularities and being highly correlated to certain complainants cases and lawyers. These 3 panelists have handled some 50 decided & published names in total. It appears there exists a strange “cases concentration” issue, the average no. of cases they should have handled should be roughly 200 names x 1/70 x 3 = 8 ~ 9 names, but they have handled a total of 50 names, 5 - 6 times of the calculated & fair average.

* For the above 50 names decision spotted, the 3 panelists ordered transfer in ALL cases. Remark : There is a case, 長江.com, HK-0800173, the complaint was rejected, yet 1 of the 3 spotted panelist David Kreider was the presiding panelist in a 3-panelist case (David was appointed by either adndrc hk or the complainant Li Ka Shing group) and he was voting to transfer the name, so he is still considered as ordering transfer in this case as well. This 長江.com case is also the case where the complainant's lawyers refiled the complaint with WIPO, intentionally not notifying WIPO the previous adndrc decision, and is recently held to be a RDNH attempt as detailed in post 3 above http://www.idnforums.com/forums/138497-post3.html with subsequent comment from fellow idners here, and the complaint has been rejected for the 2nd time).

* Statistics of names Transfer : Reject ratio

- WIPO cases - 9959 (84.9%) : 1771 (15.1%)

- adndrc hk cases

# overall : 168 (91.3%) : 16 (8.7%)
( reject rate is just 50% of WIPO cases)

# 3 panelists spotted : 100% : 0%
(subject to above remark for長江.com, HK-0800173)

# overall without the 3 spotted panelists : 88% : 12%
(still below WIPO benchmark of 85% to 15%, still some other crooks panelists not yet spotted?)


b. adndrc hk is now being requested by informers to release

* more details / explanation for certain adndrc hk cases regarding their implementation / ignorance of URDP and normal procedures

* certain strange findings being spotted

* certain particulars of the cases (including published cases; and decided but not yet published cases, with reasons for not publishing unknown)


c. adndrc hk is trying to refuse producing the details and states it cannot produce further facts 'it' considers useful. (Should data & information 'usefulness' be determined by players / users instead of determined by adndrc hk?)


d. adndrc hk is also trying to refuse producing details to the informers on the grounds that the requesting parties (the informers) are not involved parties in the cases being questioned. Informers then ask if the requests are endorsed by the involved registrants / respondents, would adndrc hk explain, adndrc hk is keeping silence and not yet replied.


e. Strange observation:

Super slow downloading speed for adndrc hk decided cases:

* For adndrc hk cases, try experiencing the speed for downloading a decided case here:

- First, go to the list of all published cases.

Either go to the direct link,
https://www.adndrc.org/icann/iPubdec...rtDescending=0

Or, go the webpage http://www.adndrc.org/adndrc/hk_home.html and look for link to “Decisions” on the left.

- The above will just bring you to the LIST of decided cases. You still have to download the case one by one by clicking the hyperlinks, and it take further time (may be 3 - 15 minutes for 1 case).



* For WIPO cases, try experiencing here:

- 長江.com Case No. D2009-0540 (Reverse Domain Name Hijacking case)
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/d...2009-0540.html

- 长实集团.com Case No. D2009-0289
http://wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decis...2009-0289.html

These 2 WIPO cases are both attempts by the same complainant’s lawyers (Wilkinson & Grist, headed by Mena Lo) in deceiving intentionally the WIPO panels by not informing the panels of their previous submission and failure with other providers.


You should experience that WIPO cases downloads are just within seconds, but it may take someone (or smart people like idners here and the informers) some 3 – 15 minutes to download just one case..

Is adndrc hk trying to discourage the download of cases deliberately so people cannot effectively do the researches and analysis on their cases to discover their crimes and conspiracy with certain RDNH lawyers, panelist and complainants??!

Last edited by MDM; 17th August 2009 at 06:35 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2009, 06:13 PM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Readers please subscribe to this thread to get instant notification for update.

Last edited by MDM; 17th August 2009 at 06:18 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2009, 07:09 PM
Drewbert's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,097
iTrader: (20)
Rep Power: 0
Drewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgy
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Change "spotted" to "highlighted", and get that information posted to circleid!
__________________
It's all jaded style to me.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2009, 11:55 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,806
iTrader: (19)
Rep Power: 802
Giant is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Good job MDM, let's work together to get rid of the crooks in the domain name arbitration business.

I have my own proof of how adndrc hk manipulate the process of selecting Presiding Penalist in 長江.com proceedings.
__________________
@

Dot Com is King. IDN.com will soon be king.
@
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 18th August 2009, 01:47 AM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giant View Post
Good job MDM, let's work together to get rid of the crooks in the domain name arbitration business.

I have my own proof of how adndrc hk manipulate the process of selecting Presiding Penalist in 長江.com proceedings.
Email us your proof Giant.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewbert View Post
Change "spotted" to "highlighted", and get that information posted to circleid!
Not really familiar with that, can someone help?






We also need more volunteers to do the analyses for the downloaded cases (took several days to download), please let us know if you wish to join or help to get rid of the crooks, this will benefit every idn domainers here. The cleaner and fairer is the arbitration mechanism, the healthier will be the domaining circle, and this effectively will raise the valuation of your domain names, see the case in .cn where the valuation & participation by foreign domainers are discouraged by the uncertainties and risks perceived.



The domain name "arbitration BUSINESS" as described by Giant does exist, and the involved parties with their benefits are detailed below:

* adndrc hk : get more cases, better "reputation", employees stay employed and even get some untold benefits

* crooks panelists : get exposures, reputation, may even get some untold benefits

* RDNH lawyers : get huge money from riches for "time costs" incurred in copying tons of newscutting in the complaint filings (there is 1 case where 800 pages of such trash newscutting were filed as appendices), get exposures, "reputation", certainly get more future benefits from the riches

* riches : they may even do not know the difference between email address and domain name, but they are approached by 'salesman' from RDNH lawyers and agree to hijack the names, in many cases, such hijacks are for collection & possession purposes (many names ordered transfer are still being inactive and not used)

Last edited by MDM; 18th August 2009 at 02:14 AM..
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 18th August 2009, 05:57 AM
Drewbert's Avatar
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,097
iTrader: (20)
Rep Power: 0
Drewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgyDrewbert is a tad dodgy
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Ask Zak to join circleid, and have him post the evidence so far.
__________________
It's all jaded style to me.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 20th August 2009, 09:00 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,806
iTrader: (19)
Rep Power: 802
Giant is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drewbert View Post
Ask Zak to join circleid, and have him post the evidence so far.

Zak was probably too busy to have spotted the evidence although I did mention to him that I would file the complaint to the Hong Kong Authorities. It's also not fair to ask him to involve because he may have to deal with ADNDRC HK frequently for his clients.

It's not difficult to see the irregularities if we read carefully the Decisions of these 3 domains: 长江.net, 长江.com, and 長江.com.

Decision date vs Published date:

长江.net Nov. 17, 2008 - Dec. 27, 2008

长江.com Jan. 1, 2009 - Jan. 2, 2009

長江.com Feb. 3, 2009 - Mar. 9, 2009

On the case of 长江.com:

- Respondent of 长江.com file its Response by mail on Nov. 15, 2008 (take at least 1 day to arrive) and Respondent would have received the Panel selection email from ADNDRC HK on Nov. 23, 2008 at the earliest and voted on the selection after Nov. 23 because ADNDRC HK needed at least 1 week to read the Response and then contact potential Panelist.

- 长江.net was decided on Nov. 17 (by Dr. Xue Hong). If ADNDRC HK published the Decision on the same day then Respondent of 长江.com would have chosen Dr. Xue Hong to be the Panelist or would have requested to have a 3-member Panel. No, ADNDRC HK chose to delay the publishing until Dec. 27, 2008 so that David Kreider was assigned Panelist without objection.


On the case of 長江.com:

- Respondent of 長江.com filed its Response on Nov. 24, 2008 and was asked to provide and rank 3 cadidates for a Panelist for the case on Dec. 16, 2008. (Respondent missed the chance to select Dr. Xue Hong)

- Respondent was asked to select Presiding Panelist on Dec. 27, 2008 (within 5 days) and Decision of 长江.com was published on Jan. 2, 2009 right after Respondent had submitted its selection. (Respondent missed the chance to exclude David Kreider by ranking him low)

5 candidates provided by ADNDRC HK for ranking are:
1. Murphy Matthew A.
2. Chi Shaojie
3. Kreider David Laurence
4. Gao Lulin
5. Wu Anthony

** The above is only SOME of the proof we have.
__________________
@

Dot Com is King. IDN.com will soon be king.
@
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 20th August 2009, 07:23 PM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giant View Post
I did mention to him [(Zak)] that I would file the complaint to the Hong Kong Authorities. [.....]
It's not difficult to see the irregularities if we read carefully the Decisions of these 3 domains: 长江.net, 长江.com, and 長江.com.

[.....]

** The above is only SOME of the proof we have.
Giant, when you are ready, our side will give the full support to join your complaints to the HK authorities. That can be criminal offence if proven.

We agree that what you, us and the various informers discovered so far just represent SOME of the crimes they have committed.

For your observations for the 3 cases, we will add our findings and comment later, we are preoccupied with some other works.
Reply With Quote
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 29th August 2009, 06:07 PM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giant View Post
5 candidates provided by ADNDRC HK for ranking are:
1. Murphy Matthew A.
2. Chi Shaojie
3. Kreider David Laurence
4. Gao Lulin
5. Wu Anthony

** The above is only SOME of the proof we have.
Giant,

In your 1st 長江.com case (3 panelists) in adndrc hk, why finally Neil Anthony Brown and Zhao Yun (not included in the 5 candidates) were finally on the panel? Zhao Yun is now found to be panelist to some 40 cases out of 200 adndrc hk, super incredibile and impossible if the proceedings are in accordance with URDP!

How did you and Wilkinson rank the 5 candidates? You can pm / email us if you think fit.

Who assigned the presiding panelist?



You really had luck to win your 1st 長江.com case in adndrc hk as the 2 panelists Zhao Yun and David Kreider were in the panel, they had track record to-date ordering 100% names transfer (except in your case Neil Anthony Brown saved you) and were appointed super quick to cases without responses received (standy-by panelist ?) !!!

Last edited by MDM; 29th August 2009 at 06:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 29th August 2009, 06:41 PM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDM View Post
... Zhao Yun is now found to be panelist to some 40 cases out of 200 adndrc hk, super incredibile and impossible if the proceedings are in accordance with URDP! ....

You really had luck to win your 1st 長江.com case in adndrc hk as the 2 panelists Zhao Yun and David Kreider were in the panel, they had track record to-date ordering 100% names transfer (except in your case Neil Anthony Brown saved you) and were appointed super quick to cases without responses received (standy-by panelist ?) !!!
Re. 长实集团.net (HK-0800191 adndrc hk case) filed by Wilkinson & Grist on behalf of Li Ka Shing group.

Respondent failed to respond to complaint by late October 2008.

Below is really strange, or is another "joke" and trace of crime regarding adndrc hk?

- October 31, 2008, adndrc hk searched for available panelists for the case

- October 31, 2008, adndrc hk sent email to Zhao Yun asking whether he was available as panelist for the case and whether he considered himself "independent and impartial" to the case

- October 31, 2008, Zhao Yun returned email confirming availability, independence and impartiality

- October 31, 2008, adndrc hk emailed Respondent and Complainant of Zhao Yun's appointment

- October 31, 2008, adndrc hk transferred case documents to Zhao Yun, decision to be rendered on/before November 17, 2008

- October 31, 2008, Zhao Yun signed off thousands words of decision

See how 'effective' they were on October 31, 2008.

- November 3, 2008, adndrc hk published the case but amended the "Date of Decision as November 3, 2008 instead of October 31, 2008
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 31st August 2009, 02:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,806
iTrader: (19)
Rep Power: 802
Giant is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDM View Post
Giant,
In your 1st 長江.com case (3 panelists) in adndrc hk, why finally Neil Anthony Brown and Zhao Yun (not included in the 5 candidates) were finally on the panel?
We ranked Brown highest on our list and CK ranked Zhao Yun highest on theirs for Panelist. Both were chosen.
__________________
@

Dot Com is King. IDN.com will soon be king.
@
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 31st August 2009, 04:15 PM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giant View Post
We ranked Brown highest on our list and CK ranked Zhao Yun highest on theirs for Panelist. Both were chosen.

With more and more researches & communication done, the more evident is adndrc hk, particular complainant's lawyers (especially W&G), particular panelists (e.g. Zhao Yun, David Kreider, Timothy Sze) have been working together to Reverse Domain Names Hijack, and have deliberate frauds, wrongdoings and even criminal offences.

Key Findings for another case HK-0800183 www.LiKaShing.org regarding Zhao Yun , the most "respectable" panelist in adndrc hk handling 40 / 200 names complaints, ordering 100% names transfer:

>> In this case, puppet (or puppy?) panelist Zhao Yun got hundred pages of Complainant and Respondent filings on 18 September 2008 from adndrc hk, incredibly, he could sign off thousands words of decison on the very same date! Do not tell us he is a super man!!! Or he is just one of adndrc hk's programmed robots to partner with complainant's RDNH lawyers to serve (or rob) the riches??!

Giant, so you know why CK (Li Ka Shing group represented by Wilkinson & Grist) sent Zhao Yun, and adndrc hk assigned David Kreider to your case now right? You are really lucky to have Brown sitting in the panel (of coz with Zak's great works as well), that's why the crooks have to go to WIPO for your name to try speculating there. You have a big victory there to expose literally the Complainant and of course its lawyers as well are participating in Reverse Domain Names Hijacking. How they have been playing their games and who are the participants in such scams are increasingly transparent now.

Giant do you want to see the pics of the cases administrators (or "manipulators") of adndrc hk? We got them from informers.

Last edited by MDM; 31st August 2009 at 04:53 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 31st August 2009, 05:45 PM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Re. Decided cases not published by adndrc hk despite phone and 6 email requests:

One of the informers recently advise that he could not find 2 long decided cases filed by the same Complainant (Li Ka Shing group) and handled by David Kreider as published in his site http://www.davidlaurencekreider.com/page10/page10.html.

Such informer says he called adndrc hk in early 2009 by phone, answered by administrator Dennis Cai. Without telling Dennis Cai the case names, Dennis Cai said adndrc hk could provide copy of decided cases if informer could not find the decided case in adndrc hk website.

Informer then emailed adndrc hk requesting the 2 cases, and have sent 6 consecutive emails within 2 weeks, all were ignored by adndrc hk.

The 2 decided cases found in David Kreider's site, but adndrc hk refused to send to the informer and has been ignoring the informer's 6 emails are:

➤ HKcc-0800004 Complainant - Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited, domain name at issue 长江.cc. (.cc simplified chinese version of Giant's name)

➤ HKcc-0800003 Complainants - Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited and Cheung Kong Center Properties Management Limited, domain name at issue 香港长江集团.cc.

Both cases were again filed by Li Ka Shing group (believed to be done by Wilkinson & Grist), and handled by David Kreider.

Anything adndrc hk is trying to hide from not publishing these 2 cases and ignoring the informer's 6 email request?

Last edited by MDM; 31st August 2009 at 05:59 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 4th September 2009, 02:24 AM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Giant, we have sent you 4 emails, please take a look in highest urgency and we need your help.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 5th September 2009, 03:06 AM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Email received and forwarded to us from an informer (one of the many cc recipients, including circleID, shown in the email) today copied here:


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

date : Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:52 PM
subject : Hong Kong arbitration scandal (adndrc hk office) - 4 Sep 09 NEW deliberate misconducts of adndrc hk SPOTTED & CAUGHT!!

adndrc hk,
(Asian Domain Names Dispute Resolution Center http://www.adndrc.org/adndrc/hk_home.html , managed and run by Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC) http://www.hkiac.org/ )


YOUR ARE SPOTTED FOR NEW WRONGDOINGS AND MISCONDUCTS TODAY (SEP 4 2009) FROM YOUR SITE!!

You understand that once a domain dispute case is decided, you are obligated to publish the decision online within 3 days under Article 10 of Supplemental Rules http://www.adndrc.org/adndrc/hk_supplemental_rules.html . You know you were defaulting in the time of publishing them but it is not the reason to BACKDATE (illegal??) the published dates of the following 2 cases to August 26 and August 13 2009, as you have been defaulting in this criteria habitually and frequently, so you do not need to do this to fix a recurrent problem.

"Decision Published Date" means "Published" (or uploaded), the uploading date for these 2 cases must be after August 29, 2009 (because we have the August 29 2009 version), WHY DO YOU MODIFY THEM!!?? If this site is considered as a document / information printed / updated everyday, are you preparing "fraudulent papers or information" for the modification? You are an arbitration center!! HOW COME YOU DO THIS??!

Dispute Case ID
Claimant Name
Respondent Name
Disputed Domain Name
Domain Decision Status
Decision Published Date


HK-0800226 Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited Long Solid Pipelines Inc. www.長實.com Transfer 26/8/2009

HK-0800228 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; 沃尔玛(中国)投资有限公司 Zhong Sou www.wal-martchina.mobi Transfer 13/8/2009



(full list of decision here : https://www.adndrc.org/icann/iPubdec...rtDescending=0 )


An arbitration center exists and get respected ONLY IF it is creditable and competent YOU UPLOADED 2 CASES ABOVE AFTER AUGUST 29 2009 BUT BACKDATED THE "PUBLISHED" DATE TRYING TO DECEIT PEOPLE, YOU FAIL IN THE THE CREDITIBILITY REQUIREMENT


Besides, for HK-0800226 長實.com case, the decision date should be August 20 2009 not August 26 2009, you even do not meet the competency criteria to be an arbitration center and we have piles of your decisions on hand showing lots of inconsistent information, some panels even cited the Rules no. wrong, in some uploaded decisions the panelists are [Remark : should be "on" not "are"??] the summary sheet does not tie to the signoff panelist .... YOU ALSO FAIL IN THE THE COMPETENCY REQUIREMENT.

DON'T BE STUPID TO DO ANY FURTHER INAPPROPRIATE, ILLEGITIMATE OR EVEN ILLEGAL MODIFICATION TO THE SITE INFORMATION AND THE DECISION DETAILS, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO SO UNDER URDP AND LAWS AND YOU ARE BEING WATCHED.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



AGAIN adndrc hk, AGAIN Li Ka Shing group (represented by Wilkinson & Grist), any correlation and implication for recurrent cases?
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 5th September 2009, 03:23 AM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

post 35 http://www.idnforums.com/forums/139963-post35.html

Quote:
Originally Posted by MDM View Post
Re. Decided cases not published by adndrc hk despite phone and 6 email requests:

One of the informers recently advise ....

The 2 decided cases found in David Kreider's site [Remark : not found on adndrc hk's site] , but adndrc hk refused to send to the informer and has been ignoring the informer's 6 emails are:

➤ HKcc-0800004 Complainant - Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited, domain name at issue 长江.cc. (.cc simplified chinese version of Giant's name)

➤ HKcc-0800003 Complainants - Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited and Cheung Kong Center Properties Management Limited, domain name at issue 香港长江集团.cc.

Again Li Ka Shing group cases (represented by Wilkinson & Grist Mena Lo??), panelist David Kreider, adndrc hk
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 24th September 2009, 08:27 AM
MDM MDM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,499
iTrader: (87)
Rep Power: 1068
MDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished roadMDM is on a distinguished road
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

adndrc hk and some of its panelists need to be monitored and taken action against

http://www.idnforums.com/forums/141018-post4.html
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 25th September 2009, 06:00 AM
dusty's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US
Posts: 177
iTrader: (11)
Rep Power: 596
dusty is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: ADNDRC HK and some of its panelists - bad, unethical & illegal conducts evidences

Congrats on getting 长江.com back. I see you adopted many of my arguments. They might have delayed publishing my case the first time so you would not be able to read it before submitting yours.

Also, I don't know if it was intentional in hopes I wouldn't read the actual decision, but there was a little drama in handing down the decision for 长江.net as well. You can read the final email exchange below. At the time I figured common mistake, but I am not so sure anymore.

2008/11/18 ADNDRC_HK <hkiac@adndrc.org>
To:
Registrar: spot Domain LLC DBA Domainsite.com

Complainant: Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited

Authorised Representative of the Complainant: Wilkinson & Grist
Respondent: Tiza Dustin Hill
Cc:
Panelist: 薛虹 博士 (Dr. Xue Hong)

From: Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre (Hong Kong Office)
Date: 18 November 2008
Re.: HK-0800174<长江.net> _Decision has been render

The appointed Panelist, 薛虹 博士 (Dr. Xue Hong) rendered a decision for the captioned domain name dispute on 15 November, 2008. (Please see the attached.)

The Panelist orders that the disputed domain name <长江.net> should be transferred to the Complainant. May we ask that the concerned Registrar spot Domain LLC DBA Domainsite.com implement the decision in accordance with the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.

The Complainant's contact details are as follow:
Complainant: Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited
Authorised Representative: Wilkinson & Grist
Tel: (852) 2524 6011
Email: iprop@wilgrist.com

************
11/18/08
Hi,

Please confirm the document from this proceeding are public domain.

Sincerely,
Dusty Hill

****************
11/18/08

Wait, there seems to be a discrepancy between the decision attached and this email. The decision says the Complaint was rejected, however the instruction in the email says the name should be transferred to the complainant. Please advise.

Sincerely,
Dusty Hill

************
11/19/08

The system had sent out the notification by error on 18 November, 2008. We apologized for the confusion.

Please ignore it and the correct version should be the one below:

To:

Registrar: spot Domain LLC DBA Domainsite.com

Complainant: Cheung Kong (Holdings) Limited

Authorised Representative of the Complainant: Wilkinson & Grist

Respondent: Tiza Dustin Hill

Cc:

Panelist: 薛虹 博士 (Dr. Xue Hong)

From: Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre (Hong Kong Office)

Date: 18 November 2008

Re.: HK-0800174<长江.net> _Decision has been render

The appointed Panelist, 薛虹 博士 (Dr. Xue Hong) rendered a decision for the captioned domain name dispute on 15 November, 2008. (Please see the attached.)

The Panelist dismissed the complaint. May we ask that the concerned Registrar spot Domain LLC DBA Domainsite.com implement the decision in accordance with the ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.

Should you have any questions, please contact the ADNDRC Case Administrator whose contact details are as follows:

ADNDRC (Hong Kong Office)
Tel: (852) 2525 2381
Fax: (852) 2524 2171
E-mail: hkiac@adndrc.org

Regards
Dennis Cai

Domain Name Case Administrator
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:05 AM.

Site Sponsors
Your ad here
buy t-shirt
מחיר הזהב

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright idnforums.com 2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58