IDN Forums - Internationalized Domain Names  
Home | Advertise on idnforums | Premium Membership

Go Back   IDN Forums - Internationalized Domain Names > IDN Discussions > General Discussion

General Discussion Feel free to talk about anything and everything in this board.

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 8th June 2009, 01:27 AM
555 555 is offline
ком.ком コム.コム
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (33)
Rep Power: 1708
555 has disabled reputation

DATE: 3 February 2009
This document has been translated from English in order to reach a wider audience. While the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has made efforts to verify the accuracy of the
translation, English is the working language of ICANN and the English original of this document is the only
official and authoritative text. You may find the English original at:
Page 1 of 3
Introductory Note
By the Staff of ICANN
This statement was produced by the then‐IDN Liaison of ALAC, Hong Xue, on 4th November
2008 as a response to the public consultation which was opened on the Draft IDN Fast Track
Implementation Plan. The statement was opened for community members’ comments, with
comments to be taken for 30 days, or until 4th December 2008, said comments to be taken
on the wiki page at
On 26th November, the document that was the object of the consultation was updated and a
new Draft Fast Track Implementation Plan posted.
As a result of the revised draft being posted, the ALAC, in it’s meeting of 9th December 2008,
resolved as follows:
The ALAC endorses the Draft Statement, subject to non-substantive editing for
grammar and style and to a review by the At-Large IDN Liaison to ensure that the
statement remains congruent with the latest IDN Fast Track Draft dated 26th
November 2008. If the IDN Liaison believes that the Statement must be amended,
these shall be proposed by the Liaison in writing on or before 15th December, and
the text as amended shall be posted for a seven-day vote to commence on 16th
December and conclude on 23rd December.
The new IDN Liaison was then tasked with the editing described in the resolution and asked
if any material changes were required. He advised the Staff of ICANN and the Chair of ALAC
that no material changes were required. The Staff performed the non‐substantive editing for
grammar and style called for in the resolution and confirms that this had no impact on the
meaning of any part of the Statement.
The Chair of ALAC transmitted the Statement to the Board of ICANN on 4th February 2009.
[End of introductory note]
Page 2 of 3
The At-Large community is inspired that the long-awaited fast-track IDN
ccTLDs will finally be implemented in a foreseeable future.
ALAC has been
very active in each step of fast-track policy development independently or
within the cross-constituency IDNC. With respect to the newly released
Implementation Plan, we have the following comments:
I. Expedition and Transparency
The salient purpose of the fast-track implementation is to meet the pressing
needs of the IDN users communities.
For this purpose, we do hope the
process shall be sufficiently fast and transparent.
From the published Plan, we
cannot see a very clear implementation time line. Based on the ICANN
Strategic Plan (2009-2012) published on 20 October 2008 and discussion on
the Public Forum on 3 November 2008, it seems that the fast-track process
will not be done at the root level until mid-2009. It is still unclear when the
application round will be launched. The user communities hope that such
critical information can be available as soon as possible.
II. Consumer Protection and Market Competition
The Implementation Plan does not specify whether IDN ccTLD registries are
required to take any preventive or transitional measures to protect the
legitimate interests of the existing individual registrants under the relevant
Since individual registrants are most probably not as resourceful as
the business sector, they would not be able to afford the expensive legal
advice or litigation. The IDN registries' preventive or transitional measures
would be essential for them.
Market competition can make the prices more
reasonable and service quality better. The user communities welcome
strengthening competition in the IDN ccTLD registration market
provided that
the IANA process is properly followed and stability and security are ensured in
the relevant name space.
III. Compliance of Community Services
The ccTLD Community has been emphasizing that serving the local Internet
community is an important feature that makes the ccTLDs different from
gTLDs. The user community notes from the Implementation Plan that the
support from the relevant script community for the IDN table is required for
evaluation among the other documentation of endorsement. The IANA
Procedure for Delegation or Redelegation of ccTLDs also clearly requires that
a relevant ccTLD delegation or redelegation request show how it will serve the
local interest in the country. In the case of an IDN ccTLD, the local interest
would be more specific.
Apparently, the ccTLDs need the support of the local user community for the
fast-track application and implementation. And, vice versa. It is in the mutual
interest of both the IDN ccTLD registry community and the local IDN user
Page 3 of 3
community to keep a very close, cooperative and supportive relationship.
Presently, some ccTLD registries have already been supportive to the local
user organizations in various ways. The outstanding examples are healthy
interaction and collaboration between the ccTLDs (such as .br and .au) and
local ALSes on policy consultations and community services. The launch of
IDN ccTLDs opens up new opportunities for both communities. If we take
translation as an example, we can see the great potential coming up. IDN
ccTLDs demonstrate the registries have the relevant capacity to provide
services in local scripts. Then, it would be reasonable for the local user
community to rely on the registries to translate the ICANN policies and other
documents into the local languages.
Enhancement of public participation is one of the goals of the ICANN's s
Strategic Plan and mandate of the new Public Participation Committee.
However, the ICANN centralized funding model for public participation is
becoming a bottleneck. In contract, the localized distributive funding model
through IDN ccTLDs would improve efficiency through linking up ICANN with
its different constituencies and ensure the sustainability of the resources. With
respect to ICANN, the clauses on community services should be incorporated
and enforced in the IDN ccTLD delegation agreements. Also, ICANN should
take the IDN ccTLD's community services or contribution as a valid
contribution to ICANN as stated in the Implementation Plan so that all the
stakeholders would have an incentive to develop the system.
We also hope
that the community-based gTLDs could take the similar path to consolidate the
connection with the user community.
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 AM.

Site Sponsors
Your ad here
buy t-shirt
מחיר הזהב

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright 2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54