IDN Forums - Internationalized Domain Names  
Home | Advertise on idnforums | Premium Membership

Go Back   IDN Forums - Internationalized Domain Names > IDN Discussions > General Discussion

General Discussion Feel free to talk about anything and everything in this board.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 20th October 2010, 12:05 PM
555 555 is offline
ком.ком コム.コム
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (33)
Rep Power: 1679
555 has disabled reputation
Fast track coming?

Some noted that a fast-track process might be suitable for issues that need urgent attention
and where there is general agreement concerning the desired outcome. Some noted that
following a PDP should be the only way to create a consensus policy. Some suggested that
consensus policies that have broad agreement might also go to fast track. [A possible
middle ground, which I believe was discussed as part of earlier deliberations but not
reflected in the report, would be to follow the model that is used for temporary policies
adopted by the board as outlined in article 4.3.4 of the RAA1: the outcome of a fast track / emergency process would only be temporary. A full PDP would be required to adopt and
implement the measures on a permanent basis.]

https://st.icann.org/icann-ppsc/index.cgi?pdp_team


What needs more urgent attention then IDN gTLD's? With all due respect to ICANN's Fast Track for IDN ccTLD's, As of now it gave no solution to the historic and immediate problem where users have no way to type in domain names in they're languages.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 20th October 2010, 12:06 PM
555 555 is offline
ком.ком コム.コム
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,141
iTrader: (33)
Rep Power: 1679
555 has disabled reputation
Re: Fast track coming?

- For issues that need urgent attention,
the ALAC supports the development of
a streamlined process which will require
less volunteer and staff time, and less
elapsed time.

- INTA agrees that, under certain
circumstances, emergency procedures
(requiring by-law amendment) may be
necessary. INTA concurs with a sunset
period that requires a subsequent (full)
PDP procedure to confirm or adapt any
temporary policy.

- Recent experiences in the GNSO have
demonstrated the need for such a
procedure so the RySG supports this
recommendation.
But it should be recognized that some
issues will be too complex to adequately
cover in a fast-track process so it would
be helpful if there were some guidelines
that could be used to decide when to
consider a fast track procedure.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:52 AM.

Site Sponsors
Your ad here
buy t-shirt
מחיר הזהב

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright idnforums.com 2005

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54