View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12th July 2006, 03:06 PM
thefabfive thefabfive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: On the Road
Posts: 2,276
iTrader: (50)
Rep Power: 1270
thefabfive is on a distinguished roadthefabfive is on a distinguished roadthefabfive is on a distinguished roadthefabfive is on a distinguished roadthefabfive is on a distinguished roadthefabfive is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to thefabfive
Re: Verisign response on DNAME or the other implementation.

Quote:
Don't discard so fast the possibility of having a free idn.idn out of your idn.com.
When people start taking about "giving" IDN.IDN to the IDN.com owners I get a little nervous. No one in the world would want to hand something this valuable to us and talk like this, if it gets ingrained in the policymaker's heads, could be a problem.

IDN.IDN should be considered an alias and not as it's own entity (assuming of course that DNAME is implemented). IDN.IDN is a way for non-English speakers to reach the proper IDN.com. IDN.com is real, IDN.IDN should be considered a tool for reaching IDN.com.
__________________
IDN? What's an IDN?
Reply With Quote