Quote:
|
Originally Posted by johnny
if you're trying to sell stuff for X,XXX or XX,XXX you better be prepared to show some serious data. it's a joke sometimes when i see people ask for xx,xxx for names i wouldn't pay that much for in ASCII. dont' get ahead of yourself. IDNs are the not same as ASCIIs.
IDN - you are case in point. you post X,XXX for names that don't get more than a few dollars A YEAR!  get yourself reexamined! |
Johnny, with all due respect, solid terms in ascii are based on a lot more than traffic stats and Sarcle has never offered anything but solid terms and besides
we're talking about reference values here. Idn sales are currently based on sales history not so much as traffic stats. The one thing of importance here is the potential a name has, that potential can be derived from several things (as you're well aware), traffic is only one of them and currently it is reasonably meaningless;
you can't really draw negative conclusions based on the traffic stats but of course the other way around is possible.
According to your reasoning the most value domain in my portfolio is an incorrectly concatenated arabic term which doesn't show up at all in the keyword tools, according to my reason the most valuable domain is a single term chinese generic which doesn't get traffic at all, I think domaining history is on my side here...
I for one concur with Sarcle.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by johnny
yeah - well, let's say that giant was one of those who wanted XX,XXX for a name that's not even worth $x,xxx. i found it funny that he even considered asking xx,xxx.
261- sure. in russian, boobs are what $40 for a night? her boobs are on me. just PM. I know a good doctor who will get it for you for a discount
|
Now you imply that you knew very well that you were not going through with the sale for the price, yet still you let Giant go through the hassle of the escrow procedure ?