Rubber Duck
16th January 2006, 08:35 AM
Japanese as we already know has one of the most complicated and varied scritps in the World.
We also know that language is not a static thing and we have noted considerable changes in the use of English since the introduction of the Computer and more so by the use of the mobile phone.
With Chinese characters what we have learnt is that they are a lot easier to read than they are to input. My understanding of the inputting of Chinese characters is that there are many different systems for doing this and with voice activation there may even be more.
My understanding of the situation in Japan is that one of the most popular methods of inputting is type in Hirigana and then use this to generate the Kanji characters. Is this true or are we totally of cue here.
I am guessing but I would think that the introduction of Mobile phones which support the use of Japanese characters will have resulted in much more use of Hirigana for informal communication.
My point or rather question is, that if this is the case, won't there be much more use of Hirigana forms for Domain Names than Overture would indicate? Won't using alternative forms on the move be much common than they are now, and won't voice recognition in any case favour Hirigana Forms as this is a phonetic alphabet? Are alternative Hirigana forms not going to be much more valuable than we might have assumed?
Best Regards
Dave Wrixon
We also know that language is not a static thing and we have noted considerable changes in the use of English since the introduction of the Computer and more so by the use of the mobile phone.
With Chinese characters what we have learnt is that they are a lot easier to read than they are to input. My understanding of the inputting of Chinese characters is that there are many different systems for doing this and with voice activation there may even be more.
My understanding of the situation in Japan is that one of the most popular methods of inputting is type in Hirigana and then use this to generate the Kanji characters. Is this true or are we totally of cue here.
I am guessing but I would think that the introduction of Mobile phones which support the use of Japanese characters will have resulted in much more use of Hirigana for informal communication.
My point or rather question is, that if this is the case, won't there be much more use of Hirigana forms for Domain Names than Overture would indicate? Won't using alternative forms on the move be much common than they are now, and won't voice recognition in any case favour Hirigana Forms as this is a phonetic alphabet? Are alternative Hirigana forms not going to be much more valuable than we might have assumed?
Best Regards
Dave Wrixon